Trending
Tanka Timilsina: From Village Radio to Millions of Hearts, the Digital Age’s Deuda Star     |     Wushu Heroes Junior Championship Concludes Successfully     |     FAO Launches National Forest Inventory Learning Journey to Strengthen Forest Data Across Asia and the…     |     Introduction to Mental Health Awareness Among Students     |     The Role of Social Media in Modern Politics     |     Parking area kathamandu before and after     |     What Kind of Student Union is Needed Today?     |     Strategies for Addressing Climate Change Impacts and Enhancing Resilience in Nepal     |     Kathmandu Valley temperature reaches 33 degrees Celsius     |     As private sector praises budget, Minister Pun says it was unveiled being realistic     |    
News & Views

Supreme Court allows writ petition against letter aiming to shield Lamichhane

May 23, 2024

The Supreme Court on Wednesday directed its administration to register a writ petition challenging the decision of the Attorney General’s Office to issue a letter stating that Deputy Prime Minister and Minister for Home Affairs Rabi Lamichhane has no cases against him related to cooperatives funds misappropriation.

At Lamichhane’s request, the OAG on May 7 issued a letter in favour of Lamichhane, who also chairs the Rastriya Swatantra Party. Last week, advocate Anupam Bhattarai moved the top court challenging the decision. However, the court administration refused to register the petition.

Bhattarai went to the Supreme Court against the decision. After a hearing, a single bench of Justice Tek Prasad Dhungana directed the court administration to register the petition. “I will file the petition on Friday,” Bhattarai told the Post. Hearing in the case is likely to begin on Sunday.

Bhattarai has demanded three rulings from the top court. First, scrap the letter which was issued without any legal basis. Second, direct the OAG not to issue such letters in the future and suspend Lamichhane from his position for the duration of the investigation on the cooperatives fraud.

 

Comment